I have recently been trying to get an answer to a simple question from East London NHS Foundation Trust; specifically Doctor Robert Dolan the Chief Executive. (robert.dolan@eastlondon.nhs.uk) According to ‘doctor’ Ferdinand Jonsson, I suffer from Persistent Delusional Disorder. The NHS has a buzz-phrase that they use everywhere ‘evidence based’. For ‘doctor’ Jonsson to arrive at a diagnosis he would have had to identify delusional beliefs that I hold. What are they?
Formally put, my question was: for each of my delusions, a) what was the belief; b) proof that I do/did hold that belief; c) proof that the belief is a delusion.
Not that difficult a question is it? However, Dr Robert Dolan and the East London NHS refuse to tell me the answer. If Dr Robert Dolan and the East London NHS who employ ‘doctor’ Ferdinand Jonsson maintain their assertion that the diagnosis is correct then why will the not allow it to be subjected to proper scrutiny?
As far as the things that I did actually say, I can either provide documentary evidence, they have come to pass and are now part of the historical record, or they are widely held beliefs by respected people. All that remains are those that were fabricated by ‘doctor’ Ferdinand Jonsson.
The truth is that there are no delusions. It was the FTAC who ordered ‘doctor’ Ferdinand Jonsson to detain me. Doctor Jonsson fabricated a reason to hold me and got two other medical professionals to back him up. He spent the next five months subjecting me to degradation, abuse and assault.
I have already documented on this blog that there was dissent amongst the doctors, the ward staff openly refusing to obey ‘doctor’ Ferdinand Jonsson’s orders and backing me up at the tribunal, and the tribunal ridiculing Jonsson with their questioning which led them to order my discharge.
Doctor Robert Dolan was fully aware of what was going on, but refused to intervene. This was despite my direct appeals to him. He condones the use of NHS facilities for political detentions.
UPDATE (24-May-2010 16:00)
A quick check of my stats shows I've had a visit from the Maudsley Hospital (IP:80.0.251.1). Hello there!
There has also been a visit from someone else at the NHS (IP:194.176.105.55). This one was via Google where they have discovered that this post is on the first page of results for "dr robert dolan"
Coercive shrinks would have to be the lowest and the stupidest of the low and the stupid. They have their own variation of, "If you don't know I'm not going to tell you". It's, "You can't argue with disease".
ReplyDeleteI can and have spent hours telling them about themselves. I can give clear reasoning for every point I make and understandable to most lay people. In conversation these people are dishonest and evasive. So I will even go to the trouble of explicitly making alternative tentative assumptions and offering varying conclusions. Invariably it is the case that any conclusions favorable to them are based on absurdities and can be rejected.
Politicians, as stabworthy as they may be, can at least say they act for a large number and can't please all the individuals. Shrinks however deliberately and systematically injure individuals directly.
Why has the user of IP:194.176.105.55 visited my blog as well? Is there someone whose job it is to monitor bloggers critical of senior figures in the NHS? Just a thought. See: http://paulwessonelection2010.blogspot.com/2010/06/do-you-trust-nhs-management.html
ReplyDelete