Sunday, 6 September 2009

My story – Part I

This is the first part of the story of my imprisonment by the FTAC. It covers my arrest and admission to hospital.



On the 10 November, 2008 between 11am and noon the police came banging on my door. This was the begging of a nightmare experience that showed just how evil the Labour regime is.

Earlier that day I had attended a meeting with a job broker called Work Directions. These are part of the nonsense of supposedly helping people get back to work. All their ‘advice’ consisted of was that there is a dark pool of hidden vacancies and all one had to do is send out speculative applications. I said that this was nonsense and that they were useless and left is some distress. On the way home I admit that I was a little in tears; there is no hope of me ever returning to work. After I had left, work directions had telephoned the police reporting my distressed state. After I had got home I put the coffee machine on and changed clothes to do the housework. I got the vacuum cleaner out, but sat to do the e-mail as I had my first cup of fresh coffee.

Then came the knocking on my front door, but I have a policy of not answering my door unless I am expecting a caller; I just ignore them and generally they get fed up and go away. The police were having none of that and carried on banking on my door and it sounded like they were about to break it down. I went to the door and told them to stop banging and to go away. Obviously, they declined that invitation. I had to open the door otherwise they would have broken it down. At which point they stormed in demanding where the gun was. I have never had a gun; I despise the things. The policeman said that they were told that was armed. I said they were talking nonsense and I said that they were free to search for one. Recognising that they could not get away with that lie, the policeman gave up on that line.

We moved from the hallway to my lounge. I sat at my desk and resumed drinking my coffee. The policeman then ‘invited’ me to go with them to a hospital; I declined. In the frank exchange of views that followed the police office said that they could get a warrant to forcibly remove me from my home. I invited them to do so and asked them to leave. The officer made a start towards the door, but halted and retuned. He then said that he wasn’t going to do that, but he was going to arrest me for breach of the peace instead. He told me to put my shoes on quickly and go with them. I asked if I may change my clothes as I was not appropriately dressed to leave the flat (the clothes I was wearing were those I use for housework etc: dirty and worn out), but he refused to let me. I was not allowed to take anything with me, no wallet or any other money, without my distance glasses, no telephone, or anything else. I had my keys and coat at that was it.

The police showed no concern about leaving my flat in a secure condition. The backdoor was unlooked; the coffee machine and other electrical equipment was left running as was the central heating.

I was marched down the stairs and out the main doors of the block. Once outside the building the police officer then said that I was now no longer under arrest for breach of the peace, but now being detained under section 136 of the mental health act. This is a clear abuse of police powers. Section 136 can only be used in a public place, not for removing someone from their home. The police abused the breach of the peace arrest to get be outside so they could use Section 136. I was then thrown into a van and the door slammed on me.

The van drove for some way before arriving at what I assume was Homerton Hospital in Hackney; I was never told where I was. I was kept in a room with two officers for several hours before I was interviewed by some medical person. During that time the police officers decided to confiscate my flat keys. I do not know if she was a doctor or a nurse; frankly I didn’t care. She asked me numerous questions, but I was not very forthcoming with responses. After the questioning finished the police officers left and I was moved to another room and left. There I remained until about 6pm. They would not admit to that hospital. I understand that it was because I did live in Hackney, but Tower Hamlets. Sometime after 6pm I was bundled into a minibus with an escort and driven to the Royal London hospital casualty department.

At the Royal London, after a sometime sitting on benches I was thrown into a room with a security guard outside. There I stayed for well over two hours before anyone bothered to see me. I was interrogated by three doctors. It was clear from their line of questioning that they had been given a false story by the police about where I was when the arrested me and what I was doing. One line of questioning implied that they thought that I was some sort of vagrant because of the state of my clothing. My explanation that those were my clothes used for dirty jobs was dismissed out of hand. It was clear that they were under instructions to detain me. After these doctors were finished I asked if I might go to the lavatory and the doctors agreed. Every time I had asked before, the security guard refused to let me. Even when I was allowed to go the door had to remain open with the guard watching me. I was left for another hour before being moved on to a third hospital.

I arrived at the Mile End hospital sometime after 10pm. I was taken on to a secure ward, dumped in a chair and told to wait. There I stayed for an hour or more before they could find me a bed. At about midnight I was allocated a room. This ward was to be my prison for nearly five months.

At no point during those twelve hours was I offered any food or drink. I had no opportunity to speak to any legal representative. No explanation of what was happening was given. Once someone is detained their human rights are suspended and they can do whatever they want to you.



The next part of the story will detail the first month of abuse I suffered at the hands of Doctor Ferdinand Jonsson. It will cover the personal degradation I was subject to and the lies to the appeal tribunal by Jonsson and the nursing staff.

Doctor confesses to political influence in clinical decisions

An example of the willingness of doctors to comply with political influence in clinical decisions has been exposed today. The case of Abdelbaset Ali Mohamed al-Megrahi yields political scandal on a daily basis. Today, there are reports that bring doubt to the validity that the medical report that was the basis of his release. Professor Karol Sikora, the medical director of CancerPartnersUK has confessed to the Sunday Telegraph, “The figure of three months was suggested as being helpful”. Duly instructed, that is what the report stated. Meanwhile in Tripoli, Megrahi has been moved out of intensive care.


Such behaviour is endemic thought the medical profession, as my experiences have shown. Doctors in the NHS are far too keen to comply with instructions as to what decisions they should make. In my case the FTAC, through the police, instructed the doctors of East London NHS to detain me and they very willingly complied.


The support from members of the public services that the Labour party enjoys makes this even easier for the government. If anyone makes any statement against the Labour government, they have plenty of willing supporters who will use whatever powers they have to act against the complainant. This is especially true within the police and NHS; both have the power to detain people. In the latter case, the poor detainee is stripped of their human rights and very limited right of appeal to a hugely biased tribunal service. That is why the government created the FTAC.

Sunday, 23 August 2009

Where is my story?

One of the reasons that my story has not started yet, apart from being sick for a bit, is that I have an outstanding complaint with the IPCC. The officer handling it, a woman by the name of DS Brady, commented that reporting the case on this blog would undermine the investigation. I originally made the complaint on 22 April, 2009 and it was only on the 1st August , 2009 that they contacted me. Since then I have had no other response. I do not expect a proper investigation; as soon as there is any mention of the FTAC, complaints disappear without trace (like their victims).


Since the IPCC will not act, I have decided that I am no longer constrained on reporting what happened. My story will commence on this blog on the 1st September, 2009. The first part will report how I was abducted from my home for breach of the peace for sitting at my desk, drinking a cup of coffee, dressed and getting organised to do the housework, and then dragged through three hospitals in the east end. It will report how the police lied to the hospitals to ensure a detention. It resulted in me not having a change of clothes, my home unlocked and electrical equipment left running for nearly a month. But that is only the start of the abuse; there is far more to tell.

Summoned to a meeting

I send a reminder e-mail message to the office of Mr Brokenshire which is followed by a number of hits on this blog from addresses known to be the NHS, and then on Saturday I get a letter from Community Psychiatric Nurse (CPN) Ramesh Rajoo (Tel: 020 7364 1183) calling me in for a meeting. Of course, there isn’t a chance in this quantum reality that I would ever attend such a meeting. It maybe that I am not long for this world!

Friday, 21 August 2009

Questions to opposition Members of Parliament

My questions to Grant Shapps were passed to the office of James Brokenshire to answer. It would appear that Mr Shapps has no opinion of the FTAC; so why did he ask questions in the House of Commons?

Someone at the Houses of Parliament (IP: 194.60.38.198) visited my website at about 16:50 on the 17 July 2009. I received a reply from an assistant to Mr Brokenshire called James Bury (buryj@parliament.uk Tel 020 7219 8400, Fax: 020 7219 2043) confirming receipt of my question shortly after, but stating that he was going on annual leave the following week and would attend to the matter upon his return.

I have been busy on another project since then so I have not been able to chase this matter. However, on the 19 August 2009 I sent a reminder to Mr Bury to see if he was going to reply to my questions. I also added brief details of my horrific experience at the hands of the FTAC. On the 20 August 2009 at about 11:12 I had another visit to my site from the same IP address as before; no reply from Mr Bury followed.

However, at about 16:20 of the 21 August, 2009, I have eight visits to the blog from an IP address registered to the NHS (194.176.105.37). They have been to my site before on the 6 July 2009. I can only speculate as to whether these two events are related.

As I type this, I’ve had another two visits to the site from the Houses of Parliament IP address. At long last, I have now received another e-mail from Mr Bury promising that Mr Brokenshire will see my e-mail and I will receive a response. That response will be published on this blog if it actually materialises and provided I have not been imprisoned again.

Update (27 Aug 2009): More of a non-update really. As expected, there has been no response from Mr Brokenshire’s office. Given the lack of response and the fact that this blog was investigated by the NHS shortly after my last query; I can only deduce that the Conservative position on the FTAC is that it fully supports it and it will continue to use the NHS to detain its political opponents. In other news; the Pope is discovered to be a catholic.

Wednesday, 5 August 2009

‘Doctor’ Ferdinand Jonsson – a danger to all.

Please see the a later post about the details of my complaint against 'doctor' Ferdinand Jonsson.

This is a quick post to show that this blog is very much alive. I’m busy on another project at the moment.


This blog is getting a little bit of traffic; which is very surprising considering the lack of marketing that I have done. However, I have studied the traffic and have concluded that it is mainly the police and health authorities keeping a track of what I am saying in the hope that they can find something they can use to lock me up again.


Today I spotted someone (IP: 78.146.85.139) coming from Google with the search term ‘Ferdinand Jonsson”. This is the ‘doctor’at Mile End Hospital that was responsible for keeping me locked up for five months until a tribunal saw through his lies and ordered my discharge. I shall have a very detailed post on this evil man later. If you, or one of your relatives, have the grave misfortune to have him as a consultant then request to have another one as soon as you can. He is an extremely dangerous man. He should never be trusted. This totally corrupt, incompetent, lying bastard should not be at liberty, and definitely should not be allowed to practice medicine, or to have the honorific ‘Doctor’.

Update (07 Sep 09): This post is the post popular one on this blog. However, many of the visits are from the NHS (IP Address: 194.176.105.37). One could almost say that they are fixated about it. It may be Jonsson ego browsing (which supports a diagnosis of him having grandiose delusions), or he could be checking to see what I am saying about him (which supports a diagnosis of paranoia). Alternatively, it could be fellow members of the NHS having a jolly good laugh at him.

If it is general NHS staff monitoring this blog then the good stuff is coming soon. I shall be naming names right up to the Chief Executive of the East London NHS Foundation Trust, Dr Robert Dolan, who refused my pleas for a meeting to discuss the abuse I was suffering at the hands of ‘doctor’ Ferdinand Jonsson. I suspect that Dolan, like many others, recognised that what Jonsson was doing was seriously wrong, but were desperate to avoid any association with the case. It won’t work.

Update 09 Jun 2010: Would you believe that the NHS keep visiting this page! Guy's have a look at the rest of the blog; I say a lot worse! If you don't like what I say about Jonsson then put me on trial.

Tuesday, 14 July 2009

Been a bit poorly

Sorry for the lack of updates.

I've had some sort of bug (not piggy flu!) for part of last week and I've fallen behind on another project of mine. So this one has suffered. I should be back with some of the story by the weekend.

I looked at the stats earlier. A few things to note. My stalker at 86.169.62.183 from London has been back today.

Also there was someone in Royal Leamington Spa at 80.189.51.95 did a google search for 'ftac james' the other day and visited my site. The 'james' in question is Doctor David V. James who the senior forensic psychiatrist the FTAC. I must do a whole post on him so that more comes up when people search for him on the internet.